Enjoy Communication, Bhopal

     Vs.

Hathways Bhaskar Multinet Pvt. Ltd., Bhopal

M. A.No. 23 of 2009 in

Petition No.185 © of 2006

Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Santacruz

 (W), Mumbai

Vs.

M/s. Vikrant Enterprises, Erandwana, Pune.

M.A. No. 3 of  2008

  In

Petition No.153  © of 2007

Om Sai Cable Network, Pune

  Vs.

Intermedia Cable Communications Pvt. Ltd. Pune.

Petition No.  67 ©  of 2008

M/s. IndusInd Media & Communications

 Ltd., Mumbai.                        

Vs.

City Cable, Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

and New Delhi.           

Petition No. 68  © of 2008

M/s. IndusInd Media & Communications

 Ltd., Mumbai.                        

Vs.

M/s. In Cable Communication, Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, 

and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

and  New Delhi.

Petition No. 69  © of  2008

M/s. IndusInd Media & Communications

 Ltd., Mumbai.                        

Vs.

M/s. Sai Ganesh Enterprise, Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

and Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

and  New Delhi.

Petition No. 87 © of  2008

M/s. Induslnd Media & Communications

Ltd., Mumbai.

Vs.

M/s. Satekrishmani Network, Mumabi,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, and

New Delhi.and

S & S Advertising Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

M/s. Indusind Media & Communications

Ltd., Mumbai.

Vs.

M/s. Sai Ganesh Enterprises, Mumbai,

SCOD Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, and

You Telecom India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

M/s. Indusind Media & Communications

Ltd., Mumbai.

Vs.

M/s. City Cable, Mumbai,

SCOD Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, and

You Telecom India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

M/s. Indusind Media & Communications

Ltd., Mumbai.

  Vs.

M/s. In Cable Communication, Mumbai,

SCOD Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, and

You Telecom India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

M/s. Indusind Media & Communications

Ltd., Mumbai.

    Vs.

M/s. S.S. Advertising, Mumbai,

SCOD Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,

You Telecom India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, and

M/s. Satekrishmani, Mumbai.

Petition.No. 284 of  2007

Bharti Hexacom Ltd., New Delhi,

BPL Mobile Communciations Ltd, Kochi,

BTA Cellcom Lt., New Delhi,

Dishnet Wirless Ltd., Chennai,

Idea Telecommunication Ltd. New Delhi,

Idea Mobile Communciations Ltd., New Delhi,

Spice Communciation Private Ltd., New Delhi,                                            

Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd., Ahmedabad,

Vodafone Essar South Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Limited, Mumbai,

Vodafone Essar Digilink Ltd., New Delhi and  Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., Coimbatore.

   Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi,

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi.

Petition No.289 of 2007

Bharti Airtel Ltd, New Delhi.

    Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi.

Petition No.290 of 2007

Bharti Airtel Ltd, New Delhi.

 Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi.

Petition No.291 of 2007

Bharti Airtel Ltd, New Delhi.

 Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi.

Petition No.292 of 2007

Bharti Airtel Ltd., New Delhi.

   Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi.

Petition No. 33 of 2008

Vodafone Essar South Limited, New Delhi.

   Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi, and   

 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi.

Petition No. 34 of 2008

Vodafone Essar South Limited, New Delhi.

      Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi and Telecom
Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi.

Petition.No. 42 of 2008

RailTel Corporation of India Ltd.,

New Delhi.

  Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi.

M.A. No. 17 of 2009 In

Petition No.199 © of 2008

(With M.A. No. 145 of 2008 )

Tata Sky Ltd., Maharashtra

     Vs.

Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Appeal No.6 of 2006

 (Part- Heard)

Along  With

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi

    Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service

 Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi and

Cellular Operators Association of India,           

 New Delhi.

Appeal No.5 of  2008                

(With M.A.No.114 of 2008)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, New Delhi.

     Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service                     Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi 

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab.

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi,

Bharti Airtel Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Mobile Service Ltd.,

New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai

 and Spice Communications Ltd., New Delhi

Appeal No. 5 of 2007 

(Part-Heard)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi.

Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,           

New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Servic

Providers of India (AUSPI) New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi,

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab,

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi, Aircel Limited, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhi Nagar,

Hutchison Essar Sout Ltd., New Delhi,

Aircel Digilink India Ltd., (CMTS),                

 New Delhi.

Hutchison Essar Ltd., Mumbai,

Hutishson Telecom East Ltd., Kolkata and

Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

Appeal No.4 of 2006 (With M.A.No. 123

  of 2006)

(Part-Heard)

Cellular Operators Association of India  New Delhi,

Aircel Ltd., Teynampet, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Cellular Ltd., Coimbatore,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

Hutchison Essar Mobile Services Ltd., New Delhi,

Spice Communications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

and Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

       Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi

Appeal No.10 of 2001

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. New Delhi.

Vs.

Cellular Operators Association of India, New Delhi,

Association of Basic Telecom Operators, New Delhi,

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi and

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd, New Delhi.

Appeal No.11 of 2001

(With M.A. No.40 of 2006)

Association of Basic Telecom operaters & Ors.,New Delhi.,

HFCL Infotel Ltd. Punjab,

Hughes Tele. Com (India) Ltd., Mumbai,

Shyam Telelink Ltd. New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd, Hyderabad, and

Bharat Telenet Ltd., New Delhi.

  Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi. and

Cellular Operators Association of India, New Delhi.

Petition.No. 44  © of 2008

(With M.A.  No. 186 of 2008)

M/s. Mana Cable Network, A.P

  Vs.

ETV, Usodaya Enterprises Ltd.,

Hyderabad and

M/s. Guntur Communication, A.P

Petition No.208  © of 2008

M/s SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

  Vs.

M/s MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Petition No. 30 © of 2009

Aurangabad Satellite Cable Services Center, West Bengal

Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Dona Cable Network, West Bengal

Appeal No.6 of 2006

 (Part- Heard)

Along  With

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi

  Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service

 Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi and

Cellular Operators Association of India,           

 New Delhi.

Appeal No.5 of  2008                

(With M.A.No.114 of 2008)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, New Delhi.

   Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service                     Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi 

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab.

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi,

Bharti Airtel Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Mobile Service Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai

 and Spice Communications Ltd., New Delhi

Appeal No. 5of 2007 

(Part-Heard)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi.

Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service

Providers of India (AUSPI) New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi,

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab,

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi, Aircel Limited, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhi Nagar,

Hutchison Essar Sout Ltd., New Delhi,

Aircel Digilink India Ltd., (CMTS), New Delhi.

Hutchison Essar Ltd., Mumbai,

Hutishson Telecom East Ltd., Kolkata and

Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

Appeal No.4 of 2006 (With M.A.No. 123 of 2006) 

(Part-Heard)

Cellular Operators Association of India

  New Delhi,

Aircel Ltd., Teynampet, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Cellular Ltd., Coimbatore,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

Hutchison Essar Mobile Services Ltd., New Delhi,

Spice Communications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

and Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

    Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,  New Delhi

Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd., Worli, Mumbai

  Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi and

Assistant Director General (LR),

Department of Telecommunications, New Delhi.

M/s Digital Radio (Delhi) Broadcasting Limited, Noida, UP

      Vs.

Director (BP&L), Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, New Delhi

M/s. K. Communication Cable Works, A.P.

Vs.

MAA Television Network Ltd., A.P.

Petiton No. 175 © of 2008 (With M.A. No. 133 of 2008)

M/s. Channel Plus (A.P), Chennai

Vs.

Amalapuram Communications Network, A.P.

Petition No. 225 © of 2008

M/S. SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai &

Warana Cable Network, Maharashtra

   Vs.

M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.,

 Hyderabad.

Petition No. 238 © of 2008

M/s. Raja Rajeshwari Channel, A.P

     Vs.

Channel Plus-AP, Tamil Nadu.

M/s Reliance Communication Ltd., Mumbai.

Vs.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi.

Petition No.209 © of 2008

(With M.A. Nos.196 of 2008 &

22 of 2009)

(Part-Heard)

Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

Appeal No.6 of 2006

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi

     Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service

 Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi and

Cellular Operators Association of India,          

 New Delhi.

Appeal No.5 of  2008                

(With M.A.No.114

of 2008)

(Part- Heard)

Along  With

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, New Delhi.

      Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service  Providers

of India (AUSPI), New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi 

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab.

Cellular Operators Association of India, New Delhi,

Bharti Airtel Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Mobile Service Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai

 and Spice Communications Ltd., New Delhi

Appeal No. 5 of 2007

(Part-Heard)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi.

    Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service

Providers of India (AUSPI) New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi,

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab,

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi, Aircel Limited, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhi Nagar,

Hutchison Essar Sout Ltd., New Delhi,

Aircel Digilink India Ltd., (CMTS), New Delhi.

Hutchison Essar Ltd., Mumbai,

Hutishson Telecom East Ltd., Kolkata and

Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

Appeal No.4 of 2006

(With M.A.No. 123 of 2006)

(Part-Heard)

Cellular Operators Association of India

  New Delhi,

Aircel Ltd., Teynampet, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Cellular Ltd., Coimbatore,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

Hutchison Essar Mobile Services Ltd.,  New Delhi,

Spice Communications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

and Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

   Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi

Zee Turner Ltd., New Delhi.

Vs.

M/s Chandhoor Cables, Erode, Tamil Nadu and

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s. Sat Link Network,

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Sat Link Control, Tamil Nadu and

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu. 

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Subam Star Vision, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu and

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Polimer Cable Network, Salem, 

Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s City Cables, Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem, Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Master Control System, Salem,

Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Media Dream Cable Vision, Dharampuri, Tamil Nadu and

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu. 

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Namakkal Satellite, Nammakkal, Tamil Nadu and 

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Rainbow Cable System, Salem, Tamil Nadu.

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s VTN Cables, Iigiris, Tamil Nadu and 

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Ojas Media Network Pvt. Ltd., Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu and

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu

Zee-Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

M/s Five Star Cable Network, Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu and

Mr. P.V. Kalyan Sundaram, Salem,

Tamil Nadu

Petiton No. 65 © of 2008

M/s. Ortel Communications Ltd., New Delhi.

                              Vs.

SUN TV Network, Chennai, and

Sridevi Communications, Visakhapatnam

Petiton No. 66 © of 2008

(With M.A. No.197 of 2008)

M/s. Ortel Communications Ltd., New Delhi.

                            Vs.

Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd., Hyderabad.

Petition No. 228 © of 2008

(With M.A.No. 205 of 2008)

M/s. Royal Entertainment Network,

Uttar Pradesh.

                                  Vs.

M/s. MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

Petition No. 232 © of 2008

M/s. Chattisgarh Broadband Network (P)

Ltd., Chattishgarh.

                              Vs.

Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

M/s. G. Cable Network.

                                   Vs.

Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

M/s Steel City Central Network., Jharkhand

                          Vs

MSM Discovery Private Ltd., Mumbai

Petition. No.270 © of 2008

(With M.A. No. 211 of 2008 )

Digicable Network (India) Private. Ltd.,

New Delhi

                             Vs

Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi

Appeal No.5 of  2008 (With M.A.No.114 of 2008)

 (Part- Heard)

Along  With

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, New Delhi.

                                  Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service                     Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi 

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab.

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi,

Bharti Airtel Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Mobile Service Ltd.,

New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai and Spice Communications Ltd., New Delhi

Appeal No.6 of  2006

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi

                        Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Service

 Providers of India (AUSPI), New Delhi and

Cellular Operators Association of India,          

 New Delhi.

Appeal No. 5 of 2007

 (Part-Heard)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi.

                        Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,            

New Delhi,

Association of Unified Telecom Servic

Providers of India (AUSPI) New Delhi,

Reliance Communications Ltd., New Delhi,

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi,

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab,

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi, Aircel Limited, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Communications Ltd., Mumbai,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhi Nagar,

Hutchison Essar Sout Ltd., New Delhi,

Aircel Digilink India Ltd., (CMTS),                 

 New Delhi.

Hutchison Essar Ltd., Mumbai,

Hutishson Telecom East Ltd., Kolkata and

Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

Appeal No.4 of 2006 (With M.A.No. 123 of 2006)

 (Part-Heard)

Cellular Operators Association of India

  New Delhi,

Aircel Ltd., Teynampet, Chennai,

BPL Mobile Cellular Ltd., Coimbatore,

Bharti Televentures Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

Hutchison Essar Mobile Services Ltd.,              

New Delhi,

Spice Communications Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi and Reliance Telecom Ltd., Gujarat.

                                Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,            

New Delhi

Petition No. 104 © of 2008

(With M.A. Nos.78, 82& 88  

 of  2008)

Tata Sky Limited, Maharashtra

                            Vs.

ESPN Software India Pvt Ltd.,

New Delhi and The Telecom Regulatory                             Authority of India, New Delhi.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                             Vs.

Siddhi Vinayak Cable, Mumbai

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                             Vs.

Onkar Cable Vision, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                             Vs.

Ravi Video Cable Services, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                             Vs.

Moon Light Cable, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                              Vs.

S.K. Cable, Mumbai

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Dipesh Cable, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Saroj Video Channel, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Diamond Communications, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                                   Vs.

M/s Al-Muneer Cable, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                                   Vs.

S.V. Choice, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                                   Vs.

Vijay Transmission, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                                  Vs.

Ultra Channel, Mumbai.

ESPN Software Pvt. Ltd. Gurgaon Haryana

                          Vs

Manthan Broadband Services Ltd, West Bengal

Eureka Cable TV Network., Goa

                          Vs

M/s. Metro Video., Goa and

Indusind Media & Communications Ltd., Goa

Datapro Information Technology Ltd., Bhosari Pune

                          Vs

Union of India, New Delhi

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.,

New Delhi  and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd.,

New Delhi.

Petition No.163 of 2006

Union of India, M/o Communications, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi

                          Vs.

Datapro Information Technology Ltd., Bhosari, Pune.

Petition No. 28 © of 2007

Hathway Mysore Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Santa Cruz (W), Mumbai.

              Vs.

Vaibhavi Cable Network, Mysore.

Petition No. 37  © of 2007

Hathway Mysore Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

                          Vs.

New Star Links, Vidyaranyapuram, Mysore.

Reliance Communications Ltd., Mumbai.

                           Vs

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited, New Delhi.

Reliance Communications Ltd., Mumbai.

                           Vs.

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited,

New Delhi.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai.

                         Vs.

S.N.D.S. Cable Vision, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai.

                          Vs.

Royal Cable, Mumbai.

Induslnd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

                          Vs.

Uttam Video Channel, Mumbai.

M/s. Classic Cable Network, Kolkata.

                          Vs.

Cablecomm Service (P) Ltd., Kolkata,

Silverline Communications (P) Ltd., Kolkata.

Petition.No. 29 © of 2008

(With M.A. No. 201 of 2008)

Eureka Cable TV Network, Goa.

                          Vs.

M/s. Valric Cable, Goa

M.A. No. 18 of 2009 

          In

Petition No.156 (C) of 2008

Silver Line Broadband Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

M.A. No. 19 of 2009

             In

Petition No.157 (C) of 2008

Silver Line Broadband Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida, U.P.

M.A. No. 20 of 2009

             In

Petition No.158 (C) of 2008

Silver Line Broadband Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Vs.

ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

Petition No.248 © of 2008

M/S. Channel Plus. (A. P.), Chennai

                            Vs.

Mr. Palanati Satyanarayana, Sole Propritor,

Chanti Communications Network (A.P.)

Petition No.251 © of 2008

Wire and Wireless (India) Ltd. Noida

                             Vs

Star Den Media Services Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi

Petition No.9 (C) of 2009

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

                           Vs.

M/s National Cable TV Service Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

                             Vs.

Link Video Vision Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

                              Vs.

Chari Cable Vision Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

                              Vs.

Siddhi Cable Vision Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

                                Vs.

Ashtavinak Cable Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

                                   Vs.

Partner Video Club Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Ashish Vision., Mumbai

Amogh Broadband Services Private Limited.,  Bangalore

                                      Vs

M/s Basaveshwara Nagar Cable Network Private Limited.,  Bangalore

Hathway Mysore Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

                          Vs.

Teleworld Star TV, Mysore.

Petition No.189(C) of 2008

Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow and

Star Vision Cable Network, U.P.

Vs.

Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd.,

New Delhi

M/s. Nirman & Associates Pvt. Ltd. Assam

                          Vs

M/s. MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

City Cable TV Network. Bulandshahr (U.P)

                          Vs

M/s. Star Den Media Services Pvt.Ltd. Delhi

M/s. Digital Infotainment Pvt. Limited, Bangalore.

                    Vs.

M/s. ESPN Software India Pvt. Limited, Bangalore.

Wire and Wireless (India) Ltd.,

(Amritsar)

                            Vs.

M/s. Star India (P) Ltd., New Delhi

 and  Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd.,

New Delhi

M/s. Ambati Communications, Guntur

                           Vs.

M/s. Maa TV Network, A.P

Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd., Chennai.

                            Vs.

Neo Sports Broadcaster Pvt Ltd., Mumbai

Gail (India) Ltd., New Delhi.

                              Vs.                             

M/s. Digital 2Virtual I S P Pvt. Ltd., Vadhodra.

M/s. Archana Telecom Services Ltd.,

New Delhi

                             Vs.

Union of India, Sanchar Bhavan,

New Delhi and

Department of Telecommunications, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi.

Cellular Operators Association of India,

New Delhi,

Bharti Airtel Ltd., New Delhi,

Bharti Hexacom Ltd., New Delhi,

Idea Cellular Ltd., Gandhinagar,

Reliance Telecom Ltd., Mumbai,

Spice Communication Ltd., New Delhi,

Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., Coimbatore.,

Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd., Gujarat.,

Vodafone Essar Ltd., Mumbai and

Vodafone Essar Digilink Ltd., New Delhi.

                             Vs.

Department of Telecommunications,

New Delhi and

Assistant Director General (WR), New Delhi.

Hathway Space Vision, Mumbai, and Hathway

Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

                                  Vs.

Perfect Vision, Mumbai.

Hathway Space Vision, Mumbai, and Hathway

 Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

                                   Vs.

Perfect Vision, Mumbai.

Star Den Media Services Pvt.Ltd.,

New Delhi,

Television Eighteen India Limited,Noida. and IBN18 Broadcast Limited, Noida.

                           Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi

Tata Sky, Mumbai, Maharashtra.

                           Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi and

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,   

  New Delhi.

Jak Communication Pvt. Ltd., Chennai

                             Vs.

Channel Plus-TN, Chennai

M/s. Rajasthan Infotainment Services, Jaipur

 and M/s. Den RIS Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

Vs

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida

Friends Cable Network, Punjab

                             Vs.

Hathway Data Communications Pvt.Ltd.,

Hathway Prime Cable Data Communications Pvt. Ltd., Chandigarh and

Fast Track Cable Network, Chandigarh.

Vinayaka Communication, Jaipur

                             Vs

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida

Sky Media Pvt. Limited, Jaipur

                         Vs

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida

M/s Den Network Ltd., New Delhi

                         Vs

M/s. Ushodaya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., A.P.

Pimpri Networking Associates, Pune

Vs.

Johny Cable Service, Pune

Pimpri Networking Association, Pimpri, Pune

Vs.

Dhanwani Cables, Pimpri, Pune

Super Entertainment Service, District Hooghly, West Bengal

Vs.

M/s Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd., Kolkatta, West Bengal

Dish TV India Ltd., Noida and

Wire and Wireless (India) Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

Star Den  Media Services Pvt. Ltd.

M/s SCOD 18 Networking Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

M/s MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Indusind Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Star India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, M/s. Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd. and

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India,

New Delhi

Hathway Cable & Datacom Private Limited., Mumbai

                          Vs

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Delhi

IndusInd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Chetan Cable, Mumbai

IndusInd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Star Vision, Mumbai

IndusInd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Archana Cablenet, Mumbai

IndusInd Media and Communications Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Phun Tyme Cable Vision, Mumbai

Wire & Wireless (India) Ltd., Mumbai,

Calcutta Communication Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Vs.

M/s. Friends Cable Netcom, West Bengal

King Network, Erode

                                Vs.

Channel Plus, Chennai

S.R. Cable TV Pvt. Ltd., Indore, MP

                                    Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

NEO Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

                                   Vs.

Cablecomm Services Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, West Bengal

M/s Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Nashik, Maharashtra and Hathway Nashik Cable Network., Nashik

                                 Vs.

Sky Link Cable Network, Nashik, Maharashtra

M/s Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Nashik, Maharashtra and Hathway Nashik Cable Network., Nashik

                                  Vs.

Karanjkar Cable Network, Nashik, Maharashtra

M/s Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Nashik, Maharashtra and Hathway Nashik Cable Network., Nashik

                                  Vs.

Golden Cable Network, Nashik, Maharashtra

M/s Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Nashik, Maharashtra and Hathway Nashik Cable Network., Nashik

                                   Vs.

Sonal Multi Vision, Nashik, Maharashtra

NEO Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

                                   Vs.

Bhima Ridhi Infotech, Sangli, Maharashtra

NEO Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

                                   Vs.

Intermedia Cable Communication Pvt. Ltd., Pune

Hirve Cable., Indore (M.P)

Vs

M/s. S.R. Cable., Indore (M.P)

Shivaji Cable., (M.P)

Vs

M/s. S.R. Cable., Indore (M.P)

Tata Sky Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida (UP)

M/s Indusind Media & Communications Ltd.,

Patparganj, Delhi

Vs

M/s Star Broadband Services (I) Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

Datapro Information Technology Ltd., Bhosari Pune

Vs

Union of India, New Delhi

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.,

New Delhi  and Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd.,

New Delhi.

Union of India, M/o Communications, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi

Vs.

Datapro Information Technology Ltd., Bhosari, Pune.

Star Den Media Services Ltd., New Delhi

                               Vs.

Dish TV India Ltd., New Delhi

Shyam Telelink Ltd.

Vs

Bharat sanchar Nigam Ltd.,

HFCL Infotel Ltd. Mohali, Punjab

Vs

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., ND

Vodafone Essar Mobile Services Ltd.,

New Delhi

                            Vs.

Department of Telecommunications, Sanchar Bhawan New Delhi

M/s. Goyal Cable TV Network, Ambala

Cantt

                          Vs.

Ambala Cable TV Network, Ambala Cantt.

Sawaria Cable Network, Haryana

                             Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida.

M.A. No. 15 of 2009 In

Petition No.254 (C) of 2008

M/s Sree Devi Master Media System, Visakhapatnam

Vs.

M/s Channel Plus A.P., Chennai

Petition No.209 © of 2008

(With M.A. No.196 of 2008)

(Part-Heard)

Hathway Cable and Datacom Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

Neo Sports Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

Hathway Nashik Cable Pvt. Ltd., Gurudwara Road, Nashik

Vs.

Vision Cable Network, Dwarka, Nashik

Hathway Nashik Cable Pvt. Ltd., Gurudwara Road, Nashik

Vs.

Vicky Cable Network,

Old Cidco, Nashik

M/s Asia Net Vision 'A, Orissa

Vs.

ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd., Haryana

and

M/s Orissa Media Vertue Pvt. Ltd., Orissa

M/s. ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon

Vs.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, New Delhi

11.02.2009

ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon

Vs.

Mr. K. Sandliya, Sole Proprietor,

M/s Preethi Communications, A.P.

Petition No.201(C) of 2008

(With MA No.156 of 2008)

Harika Cable Vision, Tenali, A.P.

Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mallad, Mumbai

Shree Ganesh Infotenment, Sangli, Maharashtra

Vs.

Ushodaya Enterprises Ltd. (Television Division), Andheri(West), Mumbai

R.G. Gupta and Sons, Kadma, Jharkhand

Vs.

M/s Sunny Cable TV Network, Jameshdpur, Purbi Singhbhum

Petition No. 322  (C) of 2006

(With MA No.184 of 2008)

R.G. Gupta and Sons, Kadma, Jharkhand

Vs.

M/s Manoj Cable Network, Purbi Singhbhum, Jharkhand

Petition No. 323  (C) of 2006

R.G. Gupta and Sons, Kadma, Jharkhand

Vs.

M/s Jay Shree Interprises, Purbi Singhbhum, Jharkhand

Hathway Nashik Cable Pvt. Ltd., Gurudwara Road, Nashik

                                    Vs

Cidco Cable Network, Cidco, Nashik

Hathway Nashik Cable Pvt. Ltd., Gurudwara Road, Nashik

                                    Vs

M.K. Cable Network, Indira Nagar, Nashik

Hathway Nashik Cable Pvt. Ltd., Gurudwara Road, Nashik

Vs.

Cidco Cable Network, Adarsh Nagar,

Cidco, Nashik

North Bombay Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Thane, Mumbai

Vs.

M/s Hathway Cable Data Com. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Haith Cable, Mumbai,

North Bombay Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Thane, Mumbai

Vs.

M/s Hathway Cable Data Com. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Bhavani Cable, Thane,

North Bombay Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Thane, Mumbai

Vs.

M/s Hathway Cable Data Com. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Cross World, Thane,

Petition No.216(C) of 2007

North Bombay Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Thane, Mumbai

Vs.

M/s Hathway Cable Data Com. Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, Magic Vision, Mumbai,

Petition No.287 (C) of 2007

M/s North Bombay Cable Network Pvt. Ltd., Kalyan Dist. Thane

Vs.

M/s  Ideal World Vision, Dombivli(E), Thane and

M/s Hathway Cable & Data Com Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai.

M/s. Vardan Vision Cable Network, Lucknow (U.P)

                               Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida,

Zee Turner Ltd., Lucknow (U.P).

 Petition No.181 ©of 2008

(With M.A .No. 6 of 2009)

Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt.Ltd.,

New Delhi and

Star Vision Cable Network, Lucknow

Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

Hathway Cable and Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow and

Star Vision Cable Network, U.P.

Vs.

Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd.,

New Delhi

Kolkata Cable & Broadband Pariseva Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata

Vs.

Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd.,

New Delhi

M/s. Malbar Vision, Kerala

Vs.

ESPN Software India (P) Ltd., Banglore / Gurgaon

Sun Direct TV Pvt. Ltd., Kottivakkam,

Chennai-44

Vs.
ESPN Software India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

M/s National Cable TV Service Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Link Video Vision Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Chari Cable Vision Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Siddhi Cable Vision Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Ashtavinak Cable Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Partner Video Club Mumbai

M/s Hathway Space Vision Mumbai

Vs.

Ashish Vision., Mumbai

Amogh Broadband Services Private Limited.,  Bangalore

                                Vs

M/s Basaveshwara Nagar Cable Network Private Limited.,  Bangalore

MA No.202 of 2008in

E.A No.5 of 2007In

 Petition No.192(C) of 2006

Shri Mahadeswara Cable Network, Bangalore

Vs.

M/s. IndusInd Media Ltd., Bangalore

Petition No. 89 (C) of 2007

(With M.A. No.73 of 2007)

Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Petition No.224(C) of 2007

Hathway Cable Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai / Bangalore

Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., New Delhi

Petition No.227(C) of 2008

(With.M.A.No. 200 of 2008)

Harika Cable Vision, A.P.

Vs.

M/s. E TV Network,Hyderabad and

M/s. Tenali Communications Network, A.P

Petition No.63(C) of 2007

(With M.A. Nos.54  & 198 of 2008)

Win Cable & Datacom Pvt. Ltd., Santacruz (West), Mumbai

Vs.

Hum Video, Bhayender (East), Thane

Hathway Bhawani Cabletel & Datacom Ltd., Santa Cruz (W), Mumbai

Vs.

Ms. B.R. Cable, Chembur, Mumbai

Tata Teleservices Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

Ministry of Communication and IT., New Delhi

Ministry of Communication and IT WPC (Wireless Planning & Coordination)., New Delhi

Ministry of Information and Broadcasting., New Delhi

TRAI (Telecom Regulatory Authority of India) New Delhi

Siti Cable Network Ltd., New Delhi

Indusland Media & Communication Ltd., New Delhi

Karol Bagh Network Private Ltd.,

New Delh

Gujarat Telelink Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad

Prakash Cable Centre., Kolkata

Kolkata Cable Network.,  Kolkata

In Cable., Gujarat

The Pooja Cable., New Delhi

M/s. Den Ltd.,  New Delhi

M/s Jay Amba Cable Network., New Delhi

M/s Nelson Communication Ltd. New Delhi

Yadav Cable., Gurgaon

06.02.2009

ICOS Entertainment, Varanasi, U.P.

Vs.

Zee Turner Ltd., Noida

Petition No.166 of 2006

(M.A. Nos. 93 of

2006, 89 of 2007 and 12  & 70 of 2008,

M/s Reliance Infocomm Ltd., New Delhi

Vs.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi

HFCL Infotel Ltd., Punjab

Vs.

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., New Delhi

Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Chennai

Vs.

M/s Channel Plus-TN, Chennai

Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Chennai

Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Chennai/Mumbai

Petition No.193 (C) of 2008

(With MA Nos. 187 of 2008 & M.A. No.14 of 2009)

Arasu Cable TV Corporation Ltd., Chennai

Vs.

Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd., Chennai / Bangalore

E.A. No.4 of 2008

 In Petition No.20 of 2002

Hughes Communications India Ltd.,

New Delhi

Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi

M/s. Kolkata Cable & Broadband Pariseva Ltd., Kolkata.

Vs.

MSM Discovery Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

Petition No.171(C) of 2008 (M.A. Nos. 123 & 124 of 2008)

Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. , Mumbai

Vs.

Star India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi and

Star Den Media Services Pvt. Ltd.,

New Delhi

Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India & Ors.

Vs.

Union of India, New Delhi and

The Wireless Advisor, New Delhi