TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT &
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DATED
28TH MAY, 2009
PETITION No.220(C) OF 2008
(M.A.No.50 of 2009)
Digital Outsourcing Pvt. Ltd.
& Anr. … Petitioners
Versus
M/s Zee Turner Limited
…Respondent
BEFORE:
HON’BLE
MR.JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR, CHAIRPERSON
HON'BLE
MR. G. D. GAIHA, MEMBER
|
For Petitioner |
: |
Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Mr. Navin Chawla, Mr. Tejveer Singh Bhatia, Advocates |
|
For Respondent |
: |
Mr. Yoginder Handoo, Advocate with Mr. Kunal Singh, Advocate for Mrs. Prathiba M. Singh,, Advocate |
ORDER
We
have heard the learned counsel for parties on M.A.No.50 of 2009. According to counsel for applicant/respondent,
a sum of approximately Rs.2.81 crores is due as on 31.5.2009 from the petitioner
to the respondent. The applicant,
therefore, prays that in view of the failure of the petitioner to pay this
large amount, the respondent should be relieved of its assurance given to the
Tribunal regarding non disconnection of supply of signals to the
petitioner. In response to this, counsel
for petitioner submits that the respondents group companies owe huge amount to
the petitioner on account of carriage fee and the petitioner should be given
credit for the same. We are afraid that
we cannot give credit for the amount towards carriage fee because the existing
agreements between the parties provide that no such set off can been given and
secondly the carriage fee amount is owed by not the respondent but group
companies as alleged.
After taking consideration into all aspects in
view, at this stage, we think that it will be appropriate to direct the
petitioner to deposit with the respondent at least an amount of Rs.1.81 crore
by or before 15.6.2009. The counsel for
the petitioner has handed over a cheque for Rs.50 lakhs to the counsel for the
respondent which he accepts without prejudice.
The remaining amount as ordered by this Tribunal shall be paid by the
petitioner to respondent by or before 15.6.2009.
In view of this
direction regarding payment, the assurance of the respondent not to disconnect,
will continue till further orders. It is
also made clear that if the petitioner fails to make payment as directed above,
the respondent will automatically stand relieved of this assurance. The above direction regarding payment is
independent of the liability of the petitioner regarding monthly payment as per
the agreement which the petitioner will continue to make independently.
Parties
may sit together to resolve any other issues including the issue regarding
Kalyan area.
Reply to the
main petition be filed within four weeks.
Rejoinder, if any, be filed within three weeks thereafter. List for directions on 5.8.2009.
......................J
(Arun Kumar)
Chairperson
…………….....
(G.
D. Gaiha)
Member